<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: marriage and separation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maxxcho.com/posts/marriage-and-separation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maxxcho.com/posts/marriage-and-separation</link>
	<description>www.maxxcho.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:03:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ritxard</title>
		<link>http://maxxcho.com/posts/marriage-and-separation/comment-page-1#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Ritxard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/09/hyeok/maxxworld/?p=58#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Maxx, I don&#039;t know when you penned this commentary on equal marriage rights, but it states the situation as I myself have been expressing it.  Eventually, opposite-sex couples will sue for a secular form of state acceptance of their relationships, and this means that 1) civil unions or whatever title is given them will be required; and 2) that state involvement in &quot;marriage&quot; will be deemed as a violation of the separation of state and religion.  I plan to send this article to members of the Hawai&#039;i legislature who are currently (Feb. 2009) considering civil union legislation, which appears to exclude opposite-sex couples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxx, I don&#8217;t know when you penned this commentary on equal marriage rights, but it states the situation as I myself have been expressing it.  Eventually, opposite-sex couples will sue for a secular form of state acceptance of their relationships, and this means that 1) civil unions or whatever title is given them will be required; and 2) that state involvement in &#8220;marriage&#8221; will be deemed as a violation of the separation of state and religion.  I plan to send this article to members of the Hawai&#8217;i legislature who are currently (Feb. 2009) considering civil union legislation, which appears to exclude opposite-sex couples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
